Журналы →  Gornyi Zhurnal →  2015 →  №12 →  Назад

DEVELOPMENT OF DEPOSITS
Название Economic and mathematical modeling of underground mining of grouped mineral deposits
DOI 10.17580/gzh.2015.12.08
Автор Kalmykov V. N., Gogotin A. A., Ivashov A. N.
Информация об авторе

Moscow State Technical University:

V. N. Kalmykov, Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences, prmpi@magtu.ru
A. A. Gogotin, Assistant Professor, Candidate of Engineering Sciences
A. N. Ivashov, Postgraduate student

Реферат

Clustering is typical of most copper-pyrite deposits in the Ural: the deposits occur in groups (3–8 deposits) within a radius of 10 to 30 km. The deposits have as a rule heavy dip and differ in thickness, occurrence and useful mineral content of ore bodies. All deposits are mineable with underground method, by separate mines incorporated under a mining-and-processing integrated works with a common processing plant. Some deposits are under mining, others are kept on standby, and some ore bodies are yet assumed as sub-economic. A scientific-and-technical problem arises on the sequence of ore deposits to be put under mining by the mining-and-processing integrated works, and on the production output of each separate mine. In the given study, this problem is solved by mathematical modeling of mining a group of deposits in different sequences. The modeling covered the following flow sheets of introduction of grouped deposits into operation: successive introduction (all deposits in the group are introduced into operation one by one); successive–parallel introduction (by subgroups of 2–3 deposits); parallel introduction (simultaneous mining at all deposits in the group). The modeling objects were accepted as 6 deposits with similar ground conditions as at the Ural copper–pyrite deposits. The solution optimality criteria were assumed the net present value and profitability index. The modeling has shown that the successive and parallel introduction of deposits into operation is inexpedient. The former flow sheet is unsuitable as raw material resources base of the mining-and-processing integrated works is used ineffectively due to essential difference in volume and quality of ore reserves at different deposits; the latter flow sheet features high initial (capital) cost. In the successive–parallel flow sheet, it is wise to introduce a subgroup of deposits in operation one-by-one, which will allow reduction in capital cost and enable construction of next mines out of the realized profit.

Ключевые слова Ural, copper–pyrite deposit groups, underground mining method, mine, mining sequence, mining-and-processing integrated works, production capacity
Библиографический список

1. Kaplunov R. P., Cheremushentsev I. A. Podzemnaya razrabotka rudnykh i rossypnykh mestorozhdeniy (Underground mining of ore and placer deposits). Moscow : Vysshaya shkola, 1966.
2. Ivanova V. V. Opredelenie vozmozhnykh tempov rosta proizvodstvennoy moshchnosti gornykh predpriyatiy kompanii v zavisimosti ot sostoyaniya ee mineralno-syrevoy bazy : avtoreferat dissertatsii … kandidata tekhnicheskikh nauk (Determination of the possible rates of growth of productive capacity of mining enterprises depending on the state of its mineral resource base : thesis of inauguration of Dissertation … of Candidate of Egnineering Scineces). Moscow, 2007. 20 p.
3. Kabirov V. R., Reyshakhrit E. I. Ekonomicheskaya otsenka effektivnosti razrabotki gruppy territorialno-sblizhennykh mestorozhdeniy metallicheskikh poleznykh iskopaemykh (Economic assessment of efficiency of development of the group of territorial-close deposits of metallic minerals). Naukovedenie = Science of Science. 2014. No. 2 (21). pp. 1–8.
4. Vakulov Yu. V. Sostoyanie voprosa opredeleniya proizvodstvennoy moshchnosti rudnikov (State of the problem of determination of productive capacity of mines). Gornyy Informatsionno-Analiticheskiy Byulleten = Mining Informational-Analytical Bulletin. 1999. No. 7. pp. 105–106.
5. Obolonska І. V. Optimіzatsіya organіzatsіyno-tekhnіchnogo zabezpechennya planovoi virobnichoi potuzhnostі vidobuvnogo pіdpriemstva (Optimization of organizationtechnical provision of planned productive capacity of mining enterprise). Bіznes Іnform = Business Inform. 2012. No. 12. pp. 116–119. (in Ukrainian)
6. Akulov A. O. Spetsifika organizatsii proizvodstva pri realizatsii investitsionnykh proektov po uvelicheniyu proizvodstvennoy moshchnosti gornodobyvayushchikh predpriyatiy (Specifics of production organization during the realization of investment projects for increasing of productive capacity of mining enterprises). Izvestiya Dalnevostochnogo federalnogo universiteta. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Bulletin of Far Eastern Federal University. Economics and Management. 2012. No. 4 (64). pp. 36–45.
7. Krivyakin K. S. Metodicheskie osnovy otsenki ispolzovaniya proizvodstvennoy moshchnosti predpriyatiya (Methodological basis of assessment of use of productive capacity of enterprise). Vestnik voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Proceedings of Voronezh State Technical University. 2010. No. 2, Vol. 6. pp. 78–82.
8. Kuznetsov A. G., Zernov V. I. Opredelenie optimalnoy proizvodstvennoy moshchnosti podzemnogo rudnika v sovremennykh ekonomicheskikh usloviyakh (Determination of optimal productive capacity of underground mine in modern economic conditions). Gornyy Informatsionno-Analiticheskiy Byulleten = Mining Informational-Analytical Bulletin. 2010. No. 6. pp. 72–81.
9. Nilsson D. S. Advantages of hight production level in underground mining. Mining Engineering. 1982. Vol. 34, No. 8. pp. 1252–1259.
10. Pires D. Mineral project evaluation. Mine Management Bulletin. October 2012. pp. 30–32.
11. Kovalchuk V. A., Obolonska І. V. Klasifіkatsіya faktorіv vplivu na velichinu і rіven vikoristannya virobnichoi potuzhnostі vidobuvnogo pіdpriemstva (Classification of factors of influence on the value and level of use of productive capacity of mining enterprise). Staliy rozvitok ekonomіki = Sustainable development of economy. 2012. No. 5. pp. 249–254. (in Ukrainian)
12. VNTP 13-2-93. Normy tekhnologicheskogo proektirovaniya gornodobyvayushchikh predpriyatiy metallurgii s podzemnym sposobom razrabotki (Departmental Norms of Production Engineering 13-2-93. Regulations of technological design of mining metallurgy enterprises with underground mining). Saint Petersburg, 1993. (in Russian)
13. Agoshkov M. I., Borisov S. S., Boyarskiy V. A. Razrabotka rudnykh i nerudnykh mestorozhdeniy (Mining of ore and non-metallic deposits). Moscow : Nedra, 1983.
14. Trends in underground mining. World Mining Equip. 1983. Vol. 7, No. 11. pp. 58–61.
15. Well H. M. Optimization of Mining Engineering Design in Mineral Valuation. Mining Engineering. 1978. Vol. 30, No. 12. pp. 1676–1684.
16. Kovalchuk V. A., Obolonska І. V., Kovalchuk M. V. Organіzatsіyno-ekonomіchniy mekhanіzm zabezpechennya planovoi virobnichoi potuzhnostі gіrnichovidobuvnogo pіdpriemstva (Organization-economic mechanism of provision of planned productive capacity of mining enterprise). Kryvyi Rih : Kryvyi Rih National University, 2014. 176 p. (in Ukrainian)
17. Balandin K. A. Funktsiya zatrat predpriyatiya, uchityvayushchaya zatraty na upravlenie proizvodstvennoy moshchnostyu (Enterprise cost function, taking into account the costs for the productive capacity management). Mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-issledovatelskiy zhurnal = International Research Journal. 2014. No. 3-3 (22). pp. 6–9.
18. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po tekhnologicheskomu proektirovaniyu gornorudnykh predpriyatiy metallurgii s podzemnym sposobom razrabotki (prilozhenie k VNTP 13-2-93) (Instructional guidelines for technological design of mining enterprises of metallurgy with underground mining (application to the Departmental Norms of Production Engineering 13-2-93)). Saint Petersburg, 1993. (in Russian)
19. Kaplunov D. R. Razvitie proizvodstvennoy moshchnosti podzemnykh rudnikov pri tekhnicheskom perevooruzhenii (Development of productive capacity of underground mines during the technical upgrading). Moscow : Nauka, 1989.
20. Shestakov V. A. Proektirovanie gornykh predpriyatiy : uchebnik dlya vuzov (Design of mining enterprises : tutorial for universities). Moscow : Moscow State Mining University, 2003.
21. Agoshkov M. I. Opredelenie proizvodstvennoy moshchnosti (Determination of productive capacity). Moscow : Metallurgizdat, 1948.
22. Golomolzin V. I. Opredelenie moshchnosti i srokov sluzhby shakht gornorudnoy promyshlennosti (Determination of capacity and service life of mining industry wells). Moscow : Nedra, 1972. 120 p.
23. Khokhryakov V. S. Otsenka effektivnosti investitsionnykh proektov otkrytykh gornykh rabot : uchebnoe posobie (Assessment of efficiency of investment projects of open-cast mining : tutorial). Ekaterinburg : Ural State Mining-Geological Academy, 1996. 180 p.

Language of full-text русский
Полный текст статьи Получить
Назад