Journals →  Eurasian mining →  2014 →  #1 →  Back

FROM THE OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF THE MINING COMPANIES AND THE ORGANIZATIONS
INSTITUTE OF MINING OF FAR EASTERN BRANCH OF RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
ArticleName Innovation technologies of processing of poor and out of balance ores and mine dumps
ArticleAuthor Samatova L. A., Shepeta E. D.
ArticleAuthorData

Institute of Mining of Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences:

Samatova L. A., Senior Researcher, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, e-mail: samatova_luiza@mail.ru

Shepeta E. D., Senior Researcher, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, e-mail: Elenashepeta56@mail.ru

Abstract

The article presents data suggesting the appropriateness of integrating the pre-concentration stage by X-ray radiometric separation (XRRS). Results of separating ores from the Skrytoye deposits and waste dump ore of the Primorye beneficiation plant using SibRados separators (Krasnoyarsk) and data generated by Vital Metals Ltd. on concentrating low-grade scheelite ore on XR-3000 separator are presented. Flotation studies on separation concentrates (upgraded ore assaying 0.6–1.2% WO3) showed very good results. Processing of the upgraded ore from the PBP waste dumps produced concentrates of 65–70% WO3 at a recovery of 86–84%. Flotation of the unsorted –5+0 mm size fraction yielded a concentrate assaying 30.6% WO3 with 37.7% recovery. The option of its pre-concentration by gravity was considered. The table concentrate (35–40% yield of the feed) assaying 0.8–0.9% WO3 at a recovery of about 80% can also be fed to the flotation in the PBP standard flow-sheet. An integrated flow-sheet for the beneficiation of mining wastes is recommended, scheelite recovery being 70.6%.

keywords Off-grade ore, scheelite, sulfide minerals, radiometric separation, gravity concentration, flotation, recovery
References

1. Gvozdev V. I. Ore-magmatic systems of scheelite-skarn sulfide deposits of the Far East of Russia. — Vladivostok: Dalnauka, 2010. — 338 p.
2. Samatova L. A., Gvozdev V. I., Kiyenko L. A., Voronova O. V., Sorokina V. A. Mineralogical and technological features of the Skrytoye scheelite deposit and the prospects for their beneficiation. Tikhookeanskaya Geologia. 2011. V. 30. No. 6. pp. 84–96.
3. Samatova L. A., Shepeta E. D., Gvozdev V. I. Mineralogical and technological features and beneficiation of low-grade scheelite ores of Primorye. Journal FTPRPI. 2012. No. 3. pp. 152–161.
4. Kobzev A. S. Trends and problematic issues in employing radiometric techniques of beneficiation. Obogashcheniye rud (Ore beneficiation). 2013. No. 1. Pp. 13–18.
5 Fedorov Yu. O., Fedorov M. Yu. The report Testing XRRS technology for pre-concentration of low-grade tungsten ores. — 2011.
6. Fedorov Yu. O., Korotkevitch V. A. Report X-ray radiometric separation of two metallurgical samples (TP-4, TP-5) on an industrial separator with PPD. — 2009.
7. Andy Haslam. Managing Director — Vital Metals Ltd. Report Developments in the Tungsten Industry — Australia. 21st ITIA Annual General Meeting Xiamen China. Thursday 25th September. 2008. — 8 p.
8. Barsky L. A., Kononov O. V., Ratmirova L. I. Selective flotation of calcium-bearing minerals. — Moscow: Nedra, 1979. — 232 p.

Language of full-text english
Full content Buy
Back