Journals →  Eurasian mining →  2017 →  #2 →  Back

INDUSTRIAL SAFETY AND LABOUR PROTECTION
ArticleName Optimization of expenditures for labor protection at deep mining
DOI 10.17580/em.2017.02.09
ArticleAuthor Gendler S. G., Grishina A. M., Kochetkova E. A.
ArticleAuthorData

Saint-Petersburg Mining University, Saint Petersburg, Russia:

Gendler S. G., Professor, Doctor of Technical Science, sgendler@mail.ru
Grishina A. M., Postgraduate

 

Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Saint Petersburg, Russia:
Kochetkova E. A., Labour Protection Specialist of Occupational Safety and Health Division

Abstract

The analysis of the state of the labor protection and industrial safety system of Russia’s coal mining industry demonstrates that the rise in the investment into the measures directed at improving does not lead to a sufficient fall in the risk of occupational injuries and occupational diseases. Moreover, it has been found that at a number of the industry’s enterprises the risk of occupational traumatism and occupational diseases follows either an upward trend or a wavelike trend with minimum and maximum values. One of the ways of achieving an increase in the effectiveness of the HSE system is determining the amount of expenditures that leads to the minimum values of the risk of occupational injuries and occupational diseases, which can be considered ‘economically justifiable risks’. In the article the procedure of calculating investment into industrial security and labor protection for coal mining companies is proposed. The method for calculating optimal expenses on preventing occupational injuries and economically justifiable risk is elaborated.

keywords Coal mine, labor protection, accident rate, coal mining industry, industrial security, cost optimization, economically viable risk
References

1. Gendler S. G., Gospodarikov D. A. Methodical basis of calculation of economic damage caused by traumatism and occupational diseases in modern conditions. Bezopasnost zhiznedeyatelnosti. 2001. No. 5. pp. 21–24.
2. Gendler S. G., Kochetkova E. A., Samarov L. Yu. Assessment of efficiency of inputs for labor safety in coal mines. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2014. No. 4. pp. 50–53.
3. Baskakov V. P. Organizational and technological provision of reduction of accident and injury risks at coal mines. Gornyy informatsionno-analiticheskiy byulleten. 2009. Special issue: Safety in coal industry. pp. 45–49.
4. State report “About the state of environment in the Komi Republic in 2010 : annual book. Syktyvkar : Ministerstvo prirodnykh resursov i okhrany okruzhayushchey sredy Respubliki Komi, 2011. 116 p.
5. Review of environmental pollution in the Northern territorial hydrometeorological and environmental monitoring management for 2009. Administration of Northern hydrometeorological and ecological monitoring, 2010.
6. Forsyuk A. A., Kobylkin S. S. State of industrial safety at coal mines of the Russian Federation. Gornyy informatsionno-analiticheskiy byulleten. 2009. Special issue: Safety in coal industry. pp. 23–26.
7. Shuvalov Yu. V., Burlakov S. D., Mikhaylova N. V. Assessment of influence of negative factors of environment on workers’ health. Proceedings of the second International scientific and technical conference “Miner’s Week”. Moscow, 2003. pp. 61–67.
8. Belnitskaya Yu. D. Process approach in the system of labor safety control at the mechanical engineering industry enterprises. Organizational committee of the Conference. 2014. p. 94.
9. Borodulya E. B., Zhirnov A. V. Problems of efficiency evaluation of business economic activity. Mezhdunarodnyy tekhniko-ekonomicheskiy zhurnal. 2014. No. 2. pp. 43–49.
10. Ermakov E. A., Senkus V. V. Methodology of estimation of efficiency of flowsheets of mines on a economic criterion and terms of industrial safety. Gornyy informatsionno-analiticheskiy byulleten. 2015. No. 3. pp. 26–37.
11. Merkusheva D. S., Mikhalchenko V. V., Rubanik Yu. T. Quantitative analysis of economic risks in coal mines. Vestnik KemGU. 2014. No. 4(60). pp. 247–251.
12. GOST R 12.0.006-2002. System of standards for labor safety. General requirements on occupational health and safety management in organization system. State Standard. Moscow.
13. GOST R 12.0.008-2009. Occupational safety standards system. Occupational safety and health management systems in organizations. Audit. State Standard. Moscow.
14. OHSAS 18001-1999. Occupational health and safety management systems — Specification.
15. Pillay M. Safety Management of Small-Sized Chemical Waste Treatment Facilities in Victoria, Australia. Management. 2012. No. 2. pp. 221–231.
16. Pillay M. What have we learned about learning from accidents? Postdisasters reflections. Safety Science. 2013. Vol. 46(4). pp. 566–584.
17. Sheng W., Sheng Z., Gao M., Yang L. Analysis of regularities and reasons of acciedents. Progress in mine safety. 2014. 800 p.
18. Andrew Hopkins. Issues in safety science. Safety Science. 2014. Iss. 67. pp. 6–14.
19. Wegman F., Hagenzieker M. Editorial safety science special issue road safety management. Safety Science. 2010. Vol. 48(9). pp. 1081–1084.
20. Brian M. Kazer. Safety at work. Safety Science. 1995. Vol. 21(1). pp. 79–80.
21. Hollnagel E. Risk + barriers = safety? Safety Science. 2008. Vol. 46(2). pp. 221–229.
22. Boyle A. J. Strategy and practice of safety management. Safety Science. 1998. Iss. 28(3). pp. 209–211.
23. Lepla J. About the introduction of safety rules. Safety Science. 1998. Iss. 29(3). pp. 189–204.
24. Hovden J. Safety control systems. Safety Science. 1996. Vol. 24(2). pp. 157–158.

Full content Optimization of expenditures for labor protection at deep mining
Back